Not everyone is so taken with what Wikileaks has wrought. I’d be curious to hear what some of you think of this take of Wikileaks and Assange, by a reader, an American leftist:

… I’m refusing to get caught up in the Wikileaks tempest. I have no problem with what Wikileaks did (I should care about “endangering troops in the field” or “exposing informers’ identities”?); I agree that [Julian] Assange is being persecuted and think it would certainly be appropriate for his family, friends and lawyers to stand by him. I think the blather about “transparency” is naïve bullshit — yet another mis-specification of the problem (how about an imperialist foreign policy and a predatory neoliberal economic program on both domestic and international fronts, including the accelerated destruction of public institutions and social protection all over the US and EU?), and that — no matter what they understand themselves to be standing for — a bunch of computer hackers doing what they do is not and never will be a political movement and is moreover destined to produce, if anything, just the opposite of what we keep hearing (and from whom, by the way?) they want to produce, as they’re only likely to piss off everyone with an Amazon or online MasterCard account and reinforce arguments for greater control of the internet to prevent freelance people with attitudes from doing precisely what they’re doing. I really just want this shit to go away, but the silly, opportunistic, incoherent lefties just latch onto anything that can be presented as challenging the state from below and they are so vulnerable to that empty, least common denominator rhetoric of transparency or openness as a political issue that they won’t let it go away any more than the bourgeois media will.

Further Reading

Gen Z’s electoral dilemma

Long dismissed as apathetic, Kenya’s youth forced a rupture in 2024. As the 2027 election approaches, their challenge is turning digital rebellion and street protest into political power.

A world reimagined in Black

By placing Kwame Nkrumah at the center of a global Black political network, Howard W. French reveals how the promise of pan-African emancipation was narrowed—and what its failure still costs Africa and the diaspora.

Securing Nigeria

Nigeria’s insecurity cannot be solved by foreign airstrikes or a failing state, but by rebuilding democratic, community-rooted systems of collective self-defense.

Empire’s middlemen

From Portuguese Goa to colonial Kampala, Mahmood Mamdani’s latest book shows how India became an instrument of empire, and a scapegoat in its aftermath.

À qui s’adresse la CAN ?

Entre le coût du transport aérien, les régimes de visas, la culture télévisuelle et l’exclusion de classe, le problème de l’affluence à la CAN est structurel — et non le signe d’un manque de passion des supporters.

Lions in the rain

The 2025 AFCON final between Senegal and Morocco was a dramatic spectacle that tested the limits of the match and the crowd, until a defining moment held everything together.