Nigeria’s Catch 22

American style democracy will only throw up more more leaders like Goodluck Jonathan.

Goodluck Jonathan, 2013. Image: Commonwealth Secretariat.

There are so many problems in Nigeria, true. But it bears reiterating that we’ve not even correctly identified the biggest one of them:  Our biggest problem is not the fact that we are an artificial country. Aside from Japan and Somalia, I can’t think of many other “real” countries.

Our biggest problem is also not Islam. Brunei, which is doing well has an almost even religious split like Nigeria does. As does Lebanon. And before some of you chew me off on about Lebanon, Lebanon’s reality is that most of their problems were created by outsiders.

Since we have eliminated the religion and tribe bit, what really is Nigeria’s problem: I’ll quote the late, great, Chinua Achebe here: The trouble with Nigeria is simply and squarely a failure of leadership.

Sadly, we have dovetailed into a catch 22 situation. Nigeria’s Catch 22 situation is simply this: our leadership is bad, because our followership is bad, unimaginative, uncreative, uninspired. Nigeria’s followership does not understand basic concepts like civic responsibilities and duties. We do not hold our leaders to account.

Lets accept one real, hard fact about this “democracy” that we have: democracy, American style, is nothing more than a popularity contest. Citizens such as we have in Nigeria, CANNOT in any circumstance, throw up good leaders in such a popularity contest. Something must give. What is it that must give? For Nigeria to throw up sound leaders who are capable of looking at current trends and plotting a future course.

We have to accept the hard truth that given the kind of citizens we have at the moment, our leadership MUST be exclusive and not inclusive.

I won’t pretend to have the answer to what the criteria for exclusion should be, I’ve been thinking about it for years. But it has to be so. Someday maybe, we will have that genuine exclusion criteria. BUT, and I insist, BUT, American style democracy, will only throw up more GEJs.*

* If you haven’t figured out who GEJ is, it’s the poplular acronym for Goodluck Ebele Jonathan.

Further Reading

Atayese

Honored in Yorubaland as “one who repairs the world,” Jesse Jackson’s life bridged civil rights, pan-Africanism, empire, and contradiction—leaving behind a legacy as expansive as it was imperfect.

Bread or Messi?

Angola’s golden jubilee culminated in a multimillion-dollar match against Argentina. The price tag—and the secrecy around it—divided a nation already grappling with inequality.

Visiting Ngara

A redevelopment project in Nairobi’s Ngara district promises revival—but raises deeper questions about capital, memory, and who has the right to shape the city.

Gen Z’s electoral dilemma

Long dismissed as apathetic, Kenya’s youth forced a rupture in 2024. As the 2027 election approaches, their challenge is turning digital rebellion and street protest into political power.

A world reimagined in Black

By placing Kwame Nkrumah at the center of a global Black political network, Howard W. French reveals how the promise of pan-African emancipation was narrowed—and what its failure still costs Africa and the diaspora.

Securing Nigeria

Nigeria’s insecurity cannot be solved by foreign airstrikes or a failing state, but by rebuilding democratic, community-rooted systems of collective self-defense.

Empire’s middlemen

From Portuguese Goa to colonial Kampala, Mahmood Mamdani’s latest book shows how India became an instrument of empire, and a scapegoat in its aftermath.