The Nobel Peace Prize: Totally irrelevant?

It is worth going through some of the dodgiest choices made by the Nobel committee in the time they've awarded the Peace Prize first in 1901.

Ellen Sirleaf Johnson in 2011 (Wiki Commons).

Today, at 11am Norwegian local time, we’ll know who’s won the 2013 Nobel Peace Prize–an award known for its growing irrelevance. Everyone predicts the winner will be Malala Yousafzai. It’s worth going through some of the dodgiest choices made by the Nobel committee in the time they’ve awarded the prize first in 1901.

Theodore Roosevelt, then-President of the United States, was awarded the prize in 1906, for negotiating a peace in the Russo-Japanese war in 1904-5–a war that he contributed to by encouraging Japan’s colonial ambitions in Korea. That and expanding American colonialism in the Philippines (yes, the US was a colonial power). Peace-loving soul that he was he then put on his pith helmet and celebrated his prize by going round East Africa on a killing spree with a ridiculously large entourage and butchering over 10,000 wild animals. Of course, he is also a renowned “conservationist.”

Elihu Root, a US diplomat and winner in 1912. He won for promoting the idea that “conflicts between states must be resolved by arbitration.” This while as Theodore Roosevelt’s Secretary of War, Root played colonizer as he “helped to bring Pacific and Latin American territories under US control. The Philippines, Cuba and Panama were occupied. Both Roosevelt and Root believed that the US was entitled to lead and govern people whom they believed to be uncivilized.”

In 1919 Woodrow Wilson won for his role in founding the League of Nations (the United Nations’s colonial forerunner), while being an out and out white supremacist at the same time. He segregated the federal civil service and opposed anti-lynching laws.

After they had not awarded the prize from 1939 to 1943 and gave it to the Red Cross in 1944, they decided in 1945, for some inexplicable reason, in favor of Cordell Hull, who as President Franklin Roosevelt’s Secretary of State had rejected reports of the Holocaust, sending Jewish refugees back to Europe and in most cases certain death.

Yes, Henry Kissinger was awarded the Peace Prize in 1973 while he was supposedly negotiating the end of the US’s colonial war in Vietnam but secretly ordering the bombing of Laos. Le Duc Tho, a Vietnamese general, who was to be the co-recipient, declined the award. Kissinger never impressed Christopher Hitchens, who called for the Nobel laureate to be prosecuted for war crimes and crimes against humanity, and claimed Kissinger had written early in his career that the problem with nuclear weapons was that they were so hard to use.

In 1979 to Agnes Gonxha Bojaxhiu, also known as Mother Theresa. No comment.

In general, the Nobel committee are always very late to the moral party. For example, they should have awarded it to Mandela when he was still considered a terrorist by South Africa’s regime, Britain and the USA and much else of the “Western” world. When they finally awarded it to Mandela, in 1993, they forced him to share it with FW de Klerk, who is accused of ordering a death squad hit–5 innocent children were murdered–while on his way to the ceremony in Norway. As we know, as recent as 2012 de Klerk was still defending Apartheid.

In 2009 Barack Obama won it “… for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples” Huh? Like Theodore Roosevelt before him, he celebrated his award by going on a killing spree. Unlike Theodore Roosevelt his victims have been people rather than animals.

Finally, Ellen Sirleaf Johnson won in 2011 (she was joint winner with  more deserving countrywomen Leymah Gbowee and Yemeni Tawakkol Karman).

Further Reading

Energy for whom?

Behind the fanfare of the Africa Climate Summit, the East African Crude Oil Pipeline shows how neocolonial extraction still drives Africa’s energy future.

The sound of revolt

On his third album, Afro-Portuguese artist Scúru Fitchádu fuses ancestral wisdom with urban revolt, turning memory and militancy into a soundtrack for resistance.

O som da revolta

No seu terceiro álbum, o artista afro-português Scúru Fitchádu funde a sabedoria ancestral com a revolta urbana, transformando memória e militância em uma trilha sonora para a resistência.

Biya forever

As Cameroon nears its presidential elections, a disintegrated opposition paves the way for the world’s oldest leader to claim a fresh mandate.

From Cornell to conscience

Hounded out of the United States for his pro-Palestine activism, Momodou Taal insists that the struggle is global, drawing strength from Malcolm X, faith, and solidarity across borders.

After the uprising

Following two years of mass protest, Kenya stands at a crossroads. A new generation of organizers is confronting an old question: how do you turn revolt into lasting change? Sungu Oyoo joins the AIAC podcast to discuss the vision of Kenya’s radical left.

Redrawing liberation

From Gaza to Africa, colonial cartography has turned land into property and people into populations to be managed. True liberation means dismantling this order, not redrawing its lines.

Who deserves the city?

Colonial urbanism cast African neighborhoods as chaotic, unplanned, and undesirable. In postcolonial Dar es Salaam, that legacy still shapes who builds, who belongs, and what the middle class fears the city becoming.

Djinns in Berlin

At the 13th Berlin Biennale, works from Zambia and beyond summon unseen forces to ask whether solidarity can withstand the gaze of surveillance.