First as tragedy, then as farce

South Africa prematurely celebrating qualification to the 2012 African Cup of Nations championship is another case of history repeating itself when it comes to the administration of football in the country.

Bafana Bafana celebrates a rare goal.

The final round of group qualifying matches for the 2012 African Nations Cup tournament in Gabon and Equatorial Guinea were played this weekend. The big news: Nigeria, Cameroon, Algeria and Egypt were knocked out and small footballing nations Botswana, Libya and Sudan qualified. The weirdest plot line, however, came in Group G.

There South Africa, Sierra Leone and Niger all ended tied in first place, all with 9 points. Egypt was already eliminated with 5 points. On Saturday night the South Africans played to a goalless draw with an ascendant Sierra Leone (the latter’s form surprised everybody). At that same time, in Cairo, Egypt’s under 23 selection beat Niger 3-0.  South Africa had beaten Egypt 1-0 and played to a goalless draw when they met in home and away group fixtures. South Africa also had the best goal record and so assumed they qualified.  At full time vs Sierra Leone, the South Africans -believing they’d qualified – started celebrating wildly; the players even taking a victory lap. However, CAF (the controlling body for football on the continent) soon brought an end to that when it cited some obscure competition rule by which Niger would be declared group winners.  Basically, in terms of the rule 14 of the competition, at the end of group play if three teams shared the top spot,  they would formed a new mini-league and CAF only considered results of head-to-head matches between those teams, i.e. Niger, South Africa and Sierra Leone. In terms of this formula Niger finished with 6 points and South Africa and Sierra Leone with 5. Niger therefore qualified to the final phase.

It’s complicated.

The South Africans now say they’ll appeal the ruling, but it looks more like saving face with the supporters.

The rub is that this is another case of history repeating itself when it comes to the South African national football team.  Remember the 2002 World Cup in Japan/Korea when South Africa let Spain and Paraguay decide their fate on the final day of group matches. This also happened in their final group match of the 2010 World Cup when they stopped playing after scoring 2 goals (they needed 4 unanswered goals) against a demoralized France.

Here’s the list of final participants for CAN 2012: The hosts Gabon and Equitorial Guinea (who qualified automatically), Botswana, Cote d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Senegal, Ghana, Guinea, Zambia, Angola, Tunisia, Mali, Niger, Morocco; Libya and Sudan

Further Reading

Atayese

Honored in Yorubaland as “one who repairs the world,” Jesse Jackson’s life bridged civil rights, pan-Africanism, empire, and contradiction—leaving behind a legacy as expansive as it was imperfect.

Bread or Messi?

Angola’s golden jubilee culminated in a multimillion-dollar match against Argentina. The price tag—and the secrecy around it—divided a nation already grappling with inequality.

Visiting Ngara

A redevelopment project in Nairobi’s Ngara district promises revival—but raises deeper questions about capital, memory, and who has the right to shape the city.

Gen Z’s electoral dilemma

Long dismissed as apathetic, Kenya’s youth forced a rupture in 2024. As the 2027 election approaches, their challenge is turning digital rebellion and street protest into political power.

A world reimagined in Black

By placing Kwame Nkrumah at the center of a global Black political network, Howard W. French reveals how the promise of pan-African emancipation was narrowed—and what its failure still costs Africa and the diaspora.

Securing Nigeria

Nigeria’s insecurity cannot be solved by foreign airstrikes or a failing state, but by rebuilding democratic, community-rooted systems of collective self-defense.