Congo: The benefit of the doubt has expired

Anyone who knows anything about Cold War politics, knows the CIA had a hand in Lumumba's murder. The only difference now is that it's been proven.

A captured Patrice Lumumba, on 6 December 1960, one month before he was murdered.

Here’s what we know now: The Eisenhower administration wrongly cast Patrice Lumumba as a proponent of Soviet ideology; the CIA provided Joseph Mobutu with the support he needed for a military coup; CIA Station Chief in the Congo, Larry Devlin, was a dirty scoundrel; and a 1975 U.S. Senate committee (The Church Committee) investigated U.S. involvement in Lumumba’s murder but failed to uncover incriminating evidence due to inattention to detail.

This “new” declassified information from the Church Committee and more is analyzed in a recent article by political scientist, Stephen Weissman, in the academic journal, Intelligence and National Security, vol. 25, no. 2. This article is not available for free, but Weissman gives a fair amount of details in a great guest column for  Weismann’s conclusion: “There can no longer be any doubt that the U.S., Belgian and Congolese governments shared major responsibility for the assassination of Lumumba in Katanga. The young prime minister was an imperfect leader during an unprecedented and overwhelming international crisis. But he continues to be honored around the world because he incarnated – if only for a moment – the nationalist and democratic struggle of the entire African continent against a recalcitrant West.”

My first thought is: Duh. Anyone who knows anything about Cold War politics, knows the CIA had a hand in Lumumba’s murder. The only difference now is that it’s been proven.

In 2002, the Belgian government admitted partial responsibility for his death, now it’s time for the other half to fess up. But I’d have to agree with a friend of mine when she says “when pigs fly.” Unfortunately, for the United States to admit responsibility for covert Cold War operations may suggest that such despicable operations are taking place during the War on Terror – and that just won’t do.

Further Reading

The culture wars are a distraction

When our political parties only have recourse to the realm of identity and culture, it is a smokescreen for their lack of political legitimacy and programmatic content. It is cynically unpolitical, and it’s all bullshit.