Congo: The benefit of the doubt has expired

Anyone who knows anything about Cold War politics, knows the CIA had a hand in Lumumba's murder. The only difference now is that it's been proven.

A captured Patrice Lumumba, on 6 December 1960, one month before he was murdered.

Here’s what we know now: The Eisenhower administration wrongly cast Patrice Lumumba as a proponent of Soviet ideology; the CIA provided Joseph Mobutu with the support he needed for a military coup; CIA Station Chief in the Congo, Larry Devlin, was a dirty scoundrel; and a 1975 U.S. Senate committee (The Church Committee) investigated U.S. involvement in Lumumba’s murder but failed to uncover incriminating evidence due to inattention to detail.

This “new” declassified information from the Church Committee and more is analyzed in a recent article by political scientist, Stephen Weissman, in the academic journal, Intelligence and National Security, vol. 25, no. 2. This article is not available for free, but Weissman gives a fair amount of details in a great guest column for AllAfrica.com.  Weismann’s conclusion: “There can no longer be any doubt that the U.S., Belgian and Congolese governments shared major responsibility for the assassination of Lumumba in Katanga. The young prime minister was an imperfect leader during an unprecedented and overwhelming international crisis. But he continues to be honored around the world because he incarnated – if only for a moment – the nationalist and democratic struggle of the entire African continent against a recalcitrant West.”

My first thought is: Duh. Anyone who knows anything about Cold War politics, knows the CIA had a hand in Lumumba’s murder. The only difference now is that it’s been proven.

In 2002, the Belgian government admitted partial responsibility for his death, now it’s time for the other half to fess up. But I’d have to agree with a friend of mine when she says “when pigs fly.” Unfortunately, for the United States to admit responsibility for covert Cold War operations may suggest that such despicable operations are taking place during the War on Terror – and that just won’t do.

Further Reading

Progress is exhausting

Pedro Pinho’s latest film follows a Portuguese engineer in Guinea-Bissau, exposing how empire survives through bureaucracy, intimacy, and the language of “development.”

The rubble of empire

Built by Italian Fascists in 1928, Mogadishu Cathedral was meant to symbolize “peaceful conquest.” Today its ruins force Somalis to confront the uneasy afterlife of colonial power and religious authority.

Atayese

Honored in Yorubaland as “one who repairs the world,” Jesse Jackson’s life bridged civil rights, pan-Africanism, empire, and contradiction—leaving behind a legacy as expansive as it was imperfect.

Bread or Messi?

Angola’s golden jubilee culminated in a multimillion-dollar match against Argentina. The price tag—and the secrecy around it—divided a nation already grappling with inequality.

Visiting Ngara

A redevelopment project in Nairobi’s Ngara district promises revival—but raises deeper questions about capital, memory, and who has the right to shape the city.

Gen Z’s electoral dilemma

Long dismissed as apathetic, Kenya’s youth forced a rupture in 2024. As the 2027 election approaches, their challenge is turning digital rebellion and street protest into political power.

A world reimagined in Black

By placing Kwame Nkrumah at the center of a global Black political network, Howard W. French reveals how the promise of pan-African emancipation was narrowed—and what its failure still costs Africa and the diaspora.

Securing Nigeria

Nigeria’s insecurity cannot be solved by foreign airstrikes or a failing state, but by rebuilding democratic, community-rooted systems of collective self-defense.