Why is the Wall St Journal trash-talking Ghana’s Blackstars

Every four years, this Ghanaian-American writer has to brace herself for the predictable slew of American media reporting about Ghana.

Ghana v England in a friendly match at Wembley Stadium in London, 2011. Image credit Akira Suemori for FIA Foundation via Flickr (CC).

It’s World Cup time, so bring on the articles full of historical stereotypes and racial codes disguised as insightful sports commentary.

The Ghanaian squads have routinely decimated the USA team for the past two World Cups. As a Ghanaian American, I side with my Blackstars and try to find the nearest Ghanaian restaurant to cheer the boys on. But every four years, I have to brace myself for the predictable slew of American media reporting about Ghana, which usually run along the lines of, WHAT/WHERE IS GHANA?  WHY DOES THIS POOR, TINY COUNTRY KEEP BEATING US?

In the past, these types of articles came out after the USA fell to Ghana. This year, The Wall Street Journal decided to up the ante and publish one even before the first match between the two teams started. In an article titled “Who is Ghana, And Why Can’t the US Beat Them?” writer Matthew Futterman makes an unoriginal attempt to explain Ghana’s past successes over America to the U.S. crowd. What does he come up with? It’s because of BIG BLACK STRONG MEN.

When you can’t go for a reason, reach for the stereotypes. Team USA states Ghana is “athletic and frightening” and “physical.” Futterman writes of the “haunting image” of Ghana’s Asamoah Gyan “emasculating” the U.S. defender Carlos Bocanegra. The writer seems both in awe and frightened by Gyan’s “burly chest” and “rock-hard shoulders.” Michael Essien is a “beast” when healthy. We’ve all heard this before.

Of course, the reason why the USA keeps falling to Ghana isn’t because of the USA’s lack of strong players. It’s not because of strategy or tactical superiority by the Black Stars and their coaching. The rhetoric lazily relies on the stereotype of scary,  beast-like Africans who, in the absence of a formal economy and state-of-the-art training facilities, just rely on sheer athleticism.

Then, there are usually articles that obsess over how poor Ghana is, like this one about how Ghana is rationing electricity to allow its citizens to watch tonight’s match.

I’m no soccer expert, but maybe if the U.S.A. sports media spent more time studying the styles and strategies of their Ghanaian opponents rather than focusing on how big and scary their muscles are or how poor their home country is, we’d know why the USA keeps falling to them.

For the record, Go, Blackstars!

Further Reading

On Safari

On our annual publishing break, Gaza’s genocide continues to unfold in real time yet slips from public grasp. This is not just a crisis of politics, but of how reality is mediated—and why we must build spaces where meaning can still take root.

The battle over the frame

As Hollywood recycles pro-war propaganda for Gen Z, Youssef Chahine’s ‘Djamila, the Algerian’ reminds us that anti-colonial cinema once turned imperial film language against its makers—and still can.

Fictions of freedom

K. Sello Duiker’s ‘The Quiet Violence of Dreams’ still haunts Cape Town, a city whose beauty masks its brutal exclusions. Two decades later, in the shadow of Amazon’s new development, its truths are more urgent than ever.

When things fall apart

Against a backdrop of global collapse, one exhibition used Chinua Achebe’s classic to hold space for voices from the Global South—and asked who gets to imagine the future.

The General sleeps

As former Nigerian president Muhammadu Buhari’s death is mourned with official reverence, a generation remembers the eight years that drove them out.

The grift tank

In Washington’s think tank ecosystem, Africa is treated as a low-stakes arena where performance substitutes for knowledge. The result: unqualified actors shaping policy on behalf of militarists, lobbyists, and frauds.

Kagame’s hidden war

Rwanda’s military deployments in Mozambique and its shadowy ties to M23 rebels in eastern Congo are not isolated interventions, rather part of a broader geopolitical strategy to expand its regional influence.