Why is the Wall St Journal trash-talking Ghana already? Go #BlackStars!

It’s World Cup time, bring on the articles full of historical stereotypes and racial codes disguised as insightful sports commentary.

For the past two World Cups, the USA team has been routinely decimated by the Ghanaian squads. As a Ghanaian American, I side with my Blackstars, and try to find the nearest Ghanaian restaurant to cheer the boys on. But every four years, I have to brace myself for the predictable slew of American media reporting about Ghana, which usually run along the lines of, WHAT/WHERE IS GHANA?  WHY DOES THIS POOR ,TINY COUNTRY KEEP BEATING US?

In the past these types of articles came out after the USA fell to Ghana. This year WSJ decided to one up the ante and publish one even before the first match between the two teams even started. In an article titled, “Who is Ghana, And Why Can’t the US Beat Them?”  writer Matthew Futterman makes an unoriginal attempt to try to explain Ghana’s past successes over America to the U.S. crowd.  What does he come up with? Because,  BIG BLACK STRONG MEN.

When you can’t go for reason, reach for stereotype.  According to Team USA, Ghana is “athletic and frightening” and “physical”. Futterman writes of the “haunting image” of Ghana’s  Asamoah Gyan “emasculating” the U.S defender Carlos Bocanegra. The writer seems both in awe of and frightened by Gyan’s “burly chest” and “rock hard shoulders”.  Michael Essien is a “beast” when healthy. We’ve all heard this before.

Of course, the reason why USA keeps falling to Ghana isn’t because of USA’s lack of strong players. It’s not because of strategy or tactical superiority on the part of the Black Stars and their coaching. The rhetoric lazily relies on the stereotype of scary,  beast-like Africans who, in the absence of a formal economy and state of the art training facilities, just rely on sheer athleticism.

Then usually come the articles that obsess over how poor Ghana is. Like this one about how Ghana is rationing electricity in order to allow its citizens to watch tonight’s match.

I’m no soccer expert, but maybe if the U.S.A. sports media  spent more time studying the styles and strategies of their Ghanaian opponents rather than focusing on how big and scary their muscles are or how poor their home country is, we’d know why the USA keeps falling to them.

For the record, Go Blackstars!

For an intro to the rich history of the Black Stars, check this superb essay by Kieran Dodds, featuring Kwame Nkrumah, Nnamdi Azikiwe, Amilcar Cabral and Stanley Matthews.



  1. There’s amazing irony in a U.S. paper using the all-brawn-no-brains frame in talking about an opponent: that’s exactly how South American commentators usually dismiss Team USA!

  2. > I’m no soccer expert

    Can you move this line to the top so that actually knowledgeable people would be spared from the travesty of reading this article?

  3. Yes because these terms have never been used to describe players or teams before in the history of football.

  4. I do think that this article in response to the Wall Street Journal is an exaggeration. Point of fact is that Futterman writes, “Indeed, the Black Stars do have their stars, as well as a mix of youth and experience.” It could just as well be opined that Futterman admires the Ghana team’s athleticism and physical dexterity.

  5. “the USA team has been routinely decimated by the Ghanaian squads” STFU winning two games by a goal (one of which was in AET) doesn’t mean the Blackstars decimated the USA Team. Thinking this crap made your team to lose today. You guys were too over cocky.

    past tense: decimated; past participle: decimated
    1. kill, destroy, or remove a large percentage or part of.

    example1: Holland decimated Spain with a 5:1 score.
    example2: Germany decimated Portugal with a 4:0 score.
    example3: United States, Germany and Portugal will decimate Ghana at this World Cup.

  6. literally ever single adjective you called out as racist is completely standard in sports commentary. you’re reading racisim into an article because you want to see it.

Mailing List

Sign up for email updates!


Not the continent with 54 countries

©Africa is a Country, 2016